Candid interview with Williams

[Keith Williams]

Keith Williams is backstage when he is rushed by TNB's backstage interviewer asking why he brought the Committee to TNB.

It's simple, isn't it? I don't really care if Cornell and MoneyMaker are at each others throats about this TNB vs MM Inc feud we're all about to embark on. I don't care if Fuyuki and MoneyMaker get their panties in a bunch about which of their protoge's, Joker or Maslow, is better. There is no threat to my position, no 'take over' at a staff-level. If the wrestlers in MoneyMakerInc do manage to run rough shot over the other wrestlers in TNB then it will be up to those wrestlers to fight back to prove that 'they' are indeed better. As far as I'm concerned all that just makes for great TV. And that is the ultimate aim of each member of the committee, no matter where they stand on either side of this current battleground

Besides, you can't tell me that if Genesis kicks Cornell's door down again that won't bring back warm and fuzzy memories for some people. You can't tell me that Jason Youngblood or Shia Storm's words will have a lot more meaning behind them if they're directed towards MoneyMaker, who they have more history with, than if they were talking-down to me. Now, if you'll excuse me...

[Keith Williams]

Keith tries to move on, but he is met with a verbal barrage of questions about the changes he is bringing to the company. One in particular about TNB Legends seems to strike a chord with him, as he turns back around with a glare in his eyes...

The changes I plan on making is to once more make this company prestigious, after some bad choices by former authority Chris Lionheart. Yes, I do plan to strip Legend status from several of the currently recognised legends. Simply because I don't think that these people deserve the status of being a legend in TNB, for a variety of reasons. Take Sylas Styles as one example. A legendary figure in this industry in general, and he was involved in TNB on and off around 2006. Because of who he is, some feel he should be considered a legend in TNB, but the thing is that he didn't really do a lot in this company all those years ago to make him a ''TNB'' Legend, if you see my point. He's been an authority figure more recently, and as I understand the current situation he will be returning to the ring this year to try to clear the dark clouds of doubt hanging over his career with the steroids accusation. Will he become a ''TNB'' Legend in time? Who knows. Or how about I give another example... In the very early stages of TNB, in 2005 and 2006, we had a wrestler by the name of ThreeG. Many think that he should be a Legend too. In my opinion he deserves an 'honourable mention' for being around and helping the company when we were still getting started. But he always walked to the beat of his own drum, tried to buck the system similar to Genesis on multiple occasions, and more often than not caused headaches for those in the front office at that time. On top of that his time around here was relatively short - if my memory serves me correctly he was gone by March 2006 and the company had only started in October 2005. These guys who will be getting their Legend-ship revoked, or consideration for Legend-ship denied will be remembered for their big moments in a different way, one which is much better in my opinion. TNB has always prided itself on it's long-reaching history, after-all.

Any more questions?